ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The COVID-19 pandemic uniquely impacted patients with breast cancer as mastectomies were allowed to proceed, yet breast reconstruction surgeries were halted. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the rates of breast reconstruction and patients' well-being. METHODS: A chart review included all patients who underwent mastectomy from December 2019 to September 2021. Patients were contacted by a member of the research team and asked to participate in a COVID-19-specific survey and to complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Patients were then grouped into "surge" or "nonsurge" groups based on the date of mastectomy. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-nine patients were included in this study. During the study period, 42% (n = 111) of the patients underwent breast reconstruction. The "surge" group included 106 patients whereas the "nonsurge" group included 153 patients. Fewer patients began breast reconstruction during the surge period compared with the nonsurge period (34.0% vs. 49.0%, p = 0.017). Eighty-six patients participated in the COVID-19 survey. Forty-one percent (n = 35) of the patients felt that their care was disrupted because of COVID-19. Eighty-three patients completed the HADS survey. Overall, 16.8% and 15.7% of the respondents fell into the moderate to severe ranges for both anxiety and depression scales, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with breast cancer have faced increased difficulties with access to breast reconstruction throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Our institution demonstrated decreased rates of breast reconstruction and an increase in anxiety and depression. The positive benefits of breast reconstruction cannot be overlooked when determining resource allocation in the future.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As on March 12, 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 as a global pandemic. Its rapid spread has posed major challenges to the management of health-care systems. Patients with hematological disorders, being immunocompromised in more ways than one, face a lot of challenges. Most of these patients require frequent visits to health-care facilities for transfusion support, infusions, surveillance, and follow-ups, which increase the risk of exposure and hence infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. AIM: We assessed the impact of the pandemic on the decisions of hematologists in Saudi Arabia. Method(s): An online survey was done through questionnaires, to understand the decisions and course of clinical treatments taken. 45 hematologist answered 20-questions structured questionnaires through online link. RESULT(S): The majority of hematologist have used virtual clinics in managing patients and have delayed or canceled well visits. Although some hematologist delayed treatment in stable patients like autologous stem cell transplantation for myeloma patients, the majority did not delay induction or consolidation therapies for patients with leukemia with curative intent plans. CONCLUSION(S): The crisis brought along with it challenges and opportunities to improve patient care through research and clinical practice. Telemedicine was sought for supporting outpatients. Malignancies were taken care of, with due precautions. Observations of decisions of hematologists resulted in the patients still being closely followed up and urgent treatments being attended to. The hematologists expressed satisfaction with the use of telemedicine. Online consultations and monitoring of patients could probably be taken as an alternative resource in such situations.Copyright © 2023 Journal of Applied Hematology Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has improved tremendously over the last few decades. HCT survivors are at increased risk of long-term complications and secondary cancers. This poses unique challenges to the HCT-related healthcare system given the growing need for survivorship care. Developing a HCT survivorship program with a dedicated clinic to survivors ensures equitable access to care and ongoing patient education. Herein, we describe our program survivorship model and our initial experience. Method(s): The Moffitt Cancer Center (MCC) survivorship clinic (SC) planning committee was initiated in September 2019. The SC was launched in January 2021 with the mission to provide high-quality, comprehensive, and personalized survivorship care and to empower patients and community health care providers with education and a roadmap for screening for late effects. The SC initially focused on allogeneic (allo) HCT patients and later opened to autologous (auto) HCT recipients in February 2022. HCT patients are referred by primary HCT team after HCT with an emphasis on preferred timeframe of initial SC visit no earlier than 3 months but less than 12 months from HCT. SC is located at 2 physical locations: main campus and satellite, with virtual visit options to account for the distance from MCC and COVID considerations. SC applies a consultative model. SC is staffed by dedicated advanced practice professional (APP), supervised by SC faculty. The scope of SC care includes but is not limited to prevention of infections (education, vaccinations), surveillance of late effects (endocrine, pulmonary function, cardiac, bone health), and general cancer screenings (breast, colon, skin cancer). Patients' clinical data from SC inception to August 2022 were reviewed. Result(s): From January 2021 to August 2022, a total of 138 patients were seen in SC. The majority were seen in person (62% in clinic, 38% by virtual visit). Median age was 58 years (range, 19-82). Median time to first SC visit was 21 months (range, 3-1464) after HCT. Allo HCT was the most common type of HCT seen in clinic (87%, n=120). Most common diagnoses were acute myeloid leukemia (43%, n=59), myelodysplastic syndrome (17%, n=23), and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (10%, n=14). Only 17 patients (12%) were seen in 2021 but the volume increased significantly in 2022. Currently there are more than 10 patients seen in SC per month. Conclusion(s): We report successful experience in launching a contemporary HCT SC despite the challenges of an ongoing COVID pandemic. As a stand-alone cancer center, we serve a wide geographical location with subspecialty and primary care providers dispersed throughout the community. Our consultative model and experience could provide a useful guide for other programs. In 2023, we plan to expand our SC to a broader population of patients receiving other cellular immunotherapies.Copyright © 2023 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy
ABSTRACT
Covid-19 infection has more relevant consequences in frail and comorbid patients but little is known about its course in patients with hematologic malignancies. In this report we would like to present the case of a patient with multiple myeloma treated with recent autologous bone marrow stem cell transplantation and affected by Covid-19 pneumonia, presenting with a possible reinfection or an extremely long viral shedding.Copyright © 2023 Tehran University of Medical Sciences.
ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), still remains a severe threat. At the time of writing this paper, the second infectious wave has caused more than 280,000 deaths all over the world. Italy was one of the first countries involved, with more than 200,000 people reported as infected and 30,000 deaths. There are no specific treatments for COVID-19 and the vaccine still remains somehow inconclusive. The world health community is trying to define and share therapeutic protocols in early and advanced clinical stages. However, numbers remain critical with a serious disease rate of 14%, ending with sepsis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiple organ failure (MOF) and vascular and thromboembolic findings. The mortality rate was estimated within 2-3%, and more than double that for individuals over 65 years old; almost one patient in three dies in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Efforts for effective solutions are underway with multiple lines of investigations, and health authorities have reported success treating infected patients with donated plasma from survivors of the illness, the proposed benefit being protective antibodies formed by the survivors. Plasma transfusion, blood and stem cells, either autologous or allograft transplantation, are not novel therapies, and in this short paper, we propose therapeutic autologous plasma and peripheral blood stem cells as a possible treatment for fulminant COVID-19 infection.
ABSTRACT
Objective. To assess the course and outcomes of COVID-19 in recipients of allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 44 adult recipients (allogeneic - 33 [75%] and autologous - 11 [25%] of HSCT who diagnosed with COVID-19 after transplantation. Group mostly represented by acute leukemia - 18 (41%) and lymphoma - 10 (22.7%). The median follow-up time since the development of COVID-19 was 231 days (1-818 days), after HSCT - 507.5 days (14-3723 days). Overall and progression-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier and Log-Rank method. We also evaluated the characteristics of the course of a new coronavirus infection. Results. Median time for the development of COVID-19 from the moment of HSCT was 122.5 days (-1-3490 days). Twelve patients (27.2%) were in grade 3-4 neutropenia at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 16 (36.4%) patients were in grade 1-2 neutropenia. Sixteen (48.4%) allo-HSCT recipients had active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at the time of COVID-19 development. Disease severity was mild in 19 (43.2%) and moderate in 13 (29.5%) patients. Overall, 200-day survival from the onset of COVID-19 was 78.8% (95% CI [63.1-88.4]). Anemia (p = 0.02) and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.01) significantly decrease OS in patients with COVID-19 after HSCT. Patients with GVHD at the time of COVID-19 onset had a better survival rate (p = 0.02). The timing of COVID-19 development after HSCT did not affect outcomes. Conclusions. The key points of the course of COVID-19 in HSCT recipients are the presence of cytopenia and graft-versus-host disease. Overall survival was 78.8%.Copyright © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
Objectives: This is a protocol for a Cochrane Review (intervention). The objectives are as follows:. To assess the benefits and adverse effects of vaccines for the prevention of infections in adults with haematological malignancies.Copyright © 2023 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
ABSTRACT
The high morbimortality due to SARS-CoV-2 infection in oncohematological diseases (OHD) and hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients in the pre-vaccine era has made vaccination a priority in this group. After HSCT, the immune responses against common vaccines such as tetanus, varicella, rubella, and polio may be lost. However, the loss of immunity developed by COVID-19 vaccination after HSCT has not been completely defined. In this study, both humoral and cellular immunity against SARS-CoV-2 were analyzed in 29 individuals with OHD who were vaccinated before receiving allogeneic (n = 11) or autologous (n = 18) HSCT. All participants had low but protective levels of neutralizing IgGs against SARS-CoV-2 after HSCT despite B-cell lymphopenia and immaturity. Although antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity was impaired, direct cellular cytotoxicity was similar to healthy donors in participants with autologous-HSCT, in contrast to individuals with allogeneic-HSCT, which severely deteriorated. No significant changes were observed in the immune response before and after HSCT. During follow-up, all reported post-HSCT SARS-CoV-2 infections were mild. This data emphasizes that COVID-19 vaccination is effective, necessary, and safe for individuals with OHD and also supports the persistence of some degree of immune protection after HSCT, at least in the short term, when patients cannot yet be revaccinated.
ABSTRACT
Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for relapsed Hodgkin's lymphoma increases the risk of infection by using intensive chemotherapy. This risk is obviously ongoing given the increased virulence of severe COVID-19. We report a case of a young man with Hodgkin's lymphoma who received conditioning chemotherapy followed by autologous HSCT and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) during the early phase of aplasia with persistence of COVID-19 beyond 30 days with favorable follow-up and clinical improvement on treatment. For this type of patient with hematologic malignancy, viral infection can be fatal and strict medical precautions with isolation rules must be maintained, especially for SARS-CoV-2.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hodgkin Disease , Male , Humans , Hodgkin Disease/therapy , Hodgkin Disease/pathology , COVID-19/therapy , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplantation, AutologousABSTRACT
Introduction: Recent studies have shown an increased risk of covid infections in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) compared to patients withoutMM, a reduction in the number of new diagnoses ofMMin 2020 compared to 2019 as well as a decrease in the survival of newly diagnoses patients. The general objective of this study was to analyze the possible impact of covid-19 pandemic in the treatment plan for patients withMM who are candidates for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Material(s) and Method(s): All patients with MM who received autologous HSCT in our hospital between March 2020 and October 2021 has been included in the study. This period coincides with the beginning of the confinement for covid-19 in our country and the date of which 88,4% of the population over 12 years of age had received the complete vaccination schedule at that time according to official data. Patient demographics, disease-related variables were obtained from the patient's medical record. On the other hand, treatment-related variables were collected from the eprescription program. Results and discussion: A total of 13 patients were undergoing induction treatment or underwent autologous HSCT during the study period, 62% were men. The median age of the patients was 55 years (30-69). Almost all patients (92,3%) were affected in some way the planned treatment. The reasons were the following: the induction treatment had to be prolonged in 5 patients (increase in the number of cycles due to the impossibility of performing the HSCT), in 4 patients the induction treatment had to be changed (bortezomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for bortezomib/ thalidomide/dexamethasone) due to the impossibility of performing apheresis as planned after the third cycle, 2 patients had delay in starting second-line treatment after disease relapse or in starting consolidation treatment and 1 patient suffered a delay in the diagnosis of relapse (delay in the planned CT scan confirming progression). Conclusion(s): Although we cannot yet know the impact on survival, the covid-19 pandemic has meant an alteration in the treatment plan of practically all myeloma patients who are candidates for HSCT and who were receiving anti-myeloma therapy in our hospital in the first 18 months after the declaration of the pandemic in our country.
ABSTRACT
Life threatening burns of non-accidental origin in neonates are extremely rare. Their management represents a great challenge, particularly since necrosectomy of deep burns and grafting at this young age are technically very demanding. Thus, a strategic surgical master plan is mandatory to achieve rapid and definitive autologous coverage and avoidance of undue risks and iatrogenic burden for the fragile neonatal patient. We present the case of a four day-old neonate who sustained non-accidental deep burns involving 40 % of its total body surface area (TBSA) and the successful application of a laboratory grown, autologous dermo-epidermal skin analogue, termed Zurich Skin (also named denovoSkin), within a clinical trial sub-study. Due to COVID-19 pandemic restrictions, a telemedicine-based approach was installed and a total of 260 cm2 Zurich Skin were transplanted, video assisted, on a wound bed previously prepared with a dermal substitute, thereby covering 20 % TBSA. Take of Zurich Skin was excellent on the chest, good to moderate on the abdomen, and poor on other small areas, where we observed a prolonged healing. After maturation, Zurich Skin showed a close to natural skin coverage without need for further reconstructive surgery. This unique case delivers the proof of concept that Zurich Skin can be successfully applied in early life and even under most adverse medical and paramedical circumstances, provided a carefully crafted masterplan properly addressing the key issues can be executed by joint forces of committed partner institutions.Copyright © 2023 The Authors
ABSTRACT
The current COVID-19 pandemic has placed unprecedented stress on the healthcare system, including HSCT. Several international organizations have created guidelines for managing different aspects of HSCT in the context of the pandemic. Comparing 2019 and 2020, our transplant center performed the same number of transplants. In both periods, transplants were mainly for patients with acute leukemia; thus, the urgency criteria was respected in light of pandemic restraints. Transplants by sibling donors and cord blood units remained the same, while transplants by unrelated donors were increased, in particular from European registries, and transplants by haploidentical donors were decreased. This change was made in light of the necessity of cryopreserving all apheresis products. We decided against cryopreserving bone marrow products due to the greater risk of drastic reduction in CD34 + cell count during the process. For urgent cases with only a haploidentical donor available, we opted for the use of PBSC following stimulation with G-CSF. GvHD prophylaxis was performed with PTCY on days + 3 + 5, cyclosporine with tapering from day + 100, and mycophenolic acid until day + 90 post-HSCT. Post-transplant outcomes such as graft failure, sepsis, and GVHD were not affected by the changes implemented. As a result of logistic difficulties, we halted our Car-T program from the start of the lockdown in March 2020 until September 2020. In accord with international guidelines, we were able to continue our HSCT program in the order to ensure a lifesaving treatment for patients with hematologic diseases for whom this procedure cannot be postponed.
ABSTRACT
A 52-year-old female patient developed facial fat necrosis presenting with cutaneous induration three weeks after minimal access cranial suspension (MACS) lift with autologous fat grafting from the abdomen. Given that the patient received the Moderna SARS-CoV-2 vaccine one week after surgery, we hypothesize that the former predisposed her to tissue ischemia leading to fat necrosis. Histological findings after biopsy were consistent with fat necrosis, which included marked dermal fibrosis with areas of focal fat necrosis, lipophages, multinucleated giant cells, and siderophages. It is our hope that documenting this rare development in literature may serve as encouragement for adverse effect reporting after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine administration and may boost inspection and monitoring of other health consequences by regulating agencies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Fat Necrosis , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , FaceABSTRACT
Here we report two cases of myeloma patients who became positive for SARS-CoV-2 infection during the acute phase of autologous stem cell transplant. Both patients were promptly treated with monoclonal antibodies and remdesivir, and, despite the profound neutropenia and lymphopenia, they did not develop respiratory failure and they remained paucisymptomatic during the entire period of aplasia. Neutrophil engraftment took place as expected and the patients were discharged quickly and did not experience adverse effects after discharge.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic generated the need to keep immunosuppressed patients away from hospital institutions for as long as possible. This in turn stimulated the implementation of a home hospitalization model for autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). PURPOSE: To analyze whether there are significant differences in post-transplantation complications related to catheters observed in patients treated in the home-transplant care modality compared to patients treated in the hospital. METHODOLOGY: Observational, analytical, longitudinal, and retrospective study of cases and controls. A convenience sample was chosen, in which the cases comprised 20 patients included in the home HSCT care model. For each patient, it was considered suitable to propose two controls among those who received autologous transplantation in the last five years with a baseline demographic and pathological profile similar to the case for whom they were control. RESULTS: The home patients achieved an average of 22.4 ± 2.6 days of evolution with an average of 16.4 ± 2.08 days post-transplant, compared to the hospital process with an average of 21.21 ± 4.18 days of evolution and 15.51 ± 3.96 days post-transplant (evolution days p = 0.022; post-transplant days p = 0.002). A higher percentage of use of parenteral nutrition (p = 0.036) and transfusions (p = 0.003) was observed during the post-transplant phase in the hospital. The rest of the therapeutic measures did not show significant differences. When analyzing the frequency of adverse effects in the post-transplant phase, a significant increase in neutropenic fever (OR = 8.55) and positive blood cultures (OR = 6.65) was observed in hospital patients. Any other significant differences in other variables related to PICC were found (presence and days of neutropenic fever, catheter infection, complications, pathogens, admission to the ICU, or death). Concerning local complications (pain, DVT, Medical adhesive-related Skin Injury, and erythema), there was more erythema in the hospital (p = 0.056). CONCLUSIONS: The results obtained indicate that regarding the appearance of complications associated with PICCs in home hospitalization HSCT patients, there are no significant differences compared to hospitalization, so that home care can be a safe context for people with these lines.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Catheterization, Central Venous , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Catheters , COVID-19/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Hospitalization , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Transplantation, Autologous/adverse effectsABSTRACT
Introduction: In winter, mortality in the elderly general population is increased. Among other causes, this is due to infections from seasonal respiratory viruses and pneumonia. Patients afer hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) frequently experience such infections. We therefore hypothesized that HSCT recipients experience excess mortality during winter. Method(s): This is a retrospective cohort study using the SBST database to assess the proportion of HSCT-patients who died during winter defned as from October to March as compared to the summer half of the year. Histograms depict distribution of dates of death. Univariate analyses for death afer allogeneic and autologous HSCT of factors potentially associated with higher risks of winter deaths such as patient age, disease, disease stage, presence of GvHD and treatment center were done by chi-squared tests. Multivariable logistic regression was done separately for all patients and those surviving less and more than 100 days and more than one year to separately evaluate early and late deaths. Result(s): Between 1997 and 2019 12'412 patients received HSCT (8107 auto, 4305 allo). 4904 patients died (3218 auto, 1686 allo). Overall, 2517 patients (51.3%) of those died in the winter season, 2387 (48.7%) in summer (fgure 1). The proportion of patients with deaths in winter did not difer by type of HSCT, age, disease or disease stage at the time of transplant. Excluding patients dying in the first 100 days and in the first year afer transplant or those dying without relapsed disease did not change these results. Only deaths in the first 100 days afer autologous HSCT had a higher number of events in winter but this did not reach statistical signifcance (p=0.17). Of particular interest, in patients afer allogeneic HSCT the proportion of deaths occurring in winter was 48%, 49%, 52% and 51% in patients with a transplant age less than 20, 20-40, 40-65 and >65 (p=0.61). Conclusion(s): Contrary to our assumption, no higher mortality in winter was found in HSCT patients pointing to no increased death rate due to respiratory viruses. Additional data will be analyzed once the Covid-19 pandemic is over. [Figure Presented].
ABSTRACT
Objective. To assess the course and outcomes of COVID-19 in recipients of allogeneic and autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Materials and methods. The retrospective study included 44 adult recipients (allogeneic – 33 [75%] and autologous – 11 [25%] of HSCT who diagnosed with COVID-19 after transplantation. Group mostly represented by acute leukemia – 18 (41%) and lymphoma – 10 (22.7%). The median follow-up time since the development of COVID-19 was 231 days (1–818 days), after HSCT – 507.5 days (14–3723 days). Overall and progression-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier and Log-Rank method. We also evaluated the characteristics of the course of a new coronavirus infection. Results. Median time for the development of COVID-19 from the moment of HSCT was 122.5 days (-1–3490 days). Twelve patients (27.2%) were in grade 3–4 neutropenia at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 16 (36.4%) patients were in grade 1–2 neutropenia. Sixteen (48.4%) allo-HSCT recipients had active graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at the time of COVID-19 development. Disease severity was mild in 19 (43.2%) and moderate in 13 (29.5%) patients. Overall, 200-day survival from the onset of COVID-19 was 78.8% (95% CI [63.1–88.4]). Anemia (p = 0.02) and thrombocytopenia (p = 0.01) significantly decrease OS in patients with COVID-19 after HSCT. Patients with GVHD at the time of COVID-19 onset had a better survival rate (p = 0.02). The timing of COVID-19 development after HSCT did not affect outcomes. Conclusions. The key points of the course of COVID-19 in HSCT recipients are the presence of cytopenia and graft-versus-host disease. Overall survival was 78.8%. © 2022, Interregional Association for Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
ABSTRACT
The severe adult respiratory syndrome virus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has a strong immunological and inflammatory component; accordingly investigators are employing monoclonal antibodies to ameliorate the virus-induced cytokine storm such as antibodies against interleukin 6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factors alpha (TNF-alpha) and CC chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) (1). Cyclophosphamide (Cy) has proven its role in various settings including autoimmune diseases, and in the post-haploidentical stem cell transplant setting; Cy depletes cytotoxic and effector T cell populations while relatively sparing the regulatory T cells (Tregs) and could tip the balance away from the overtly pro-inflammatory setting (1). We present here the cases of three persons who were infected by the SARS-CoV-2 virus during the Cy-induced pancytopenia of an autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), aimed to down-regulate the immune response in multiple sclerosis (MS) (2). The surprisingly benign course of the COVID-19 in the three cases suggest that the Cy could have had a role in abrogating the inflammatory response in these persons.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Multiple Sclerosis , Adult , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Multiple Sclerosis/therapy , Autografts , CyclophosphamideABSTRACT
The Francophone Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (SFGM-TC) organized the 12th workshop on hematopoietic stem cell transplantation clinical practices harmonization procedures on September 2021 in Lille, France. In the absence of specific national or international recommendation, the French working group for autologous stem Cell transplantation in Auto-immune Diseases (MATHEC) proposed guidances for vaccinations of patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune disease, including in the context of SARS-Cov-2 pandemic.